Jeremy Beaudry / projects and texts

Planning a Riverfront for Philadelphia

Posted on November 29, 2006 in activism, of interest, project news

A version of this text is printed in the November 29, 2006 edition of the The Spirit community newspaper in Fishtown—hence the slightly awkward journalistic tone.

Philadelphia residents have an unprecedented opportunity to work with local civic leaders and urban planning and design professionals to envision a world-class riverfront along the central Delaware River. In mid-October when Mayor Street issued the executive order creating the Central Delaware Advisory Group, a working body of 45 representatives from various communities, non-profits and offices around the city, he challenged Philadelphians to imagine the very best for the riverfront and to think boldly about the character of the riverfront we would like to live on, work on, and enjoy for generations to come. It is with a great sense of duty and honor that I serve as the liaison between the residents of my neighborhood of Fishtown and this advisory group.

Shortly after the mayor’s executive order, the riverfront visioning process quickly began with a series of 3 walks along the Delaware River from South Philly through Penn’s Landing and north beyond Penn Treaty Park into Port Richmond. These well-attended walks and talks were instrumental in reminding us of the rich history of the riverfront as well as revealing the current condition of the land along the river.

The first meeting of the Central Delaware Advisory Group was held in early November in a packed conference room at the offices of the Philadelphia City Planning Commission. With introductions by Janice Woodcock, executive director of the planning commission, and Harris Steinberg and Harris Sokolof of the University of Pennsylvania’s Penn Praxis, the year-long visioning and planning process officially began. We talked with each other about the concerns and hopes our neighborhoods have for the riverfront. We recounted memorable experiences from other waterfronts that we have had in Philadelphia and in other cities around the world. We generated an informal list of uses and features we think it will be important to consider in any riverfront plan: things like a vibrant port industry, open spaces, housing, local businesses, and so on.

We learned that the next year would see numerous civic engagement forums and meetings across the city to gather input from Philadelphians on what they desire for the riverfront. Early next year a team of design professionals will be commissioned to work with the public and advisory group to interpret that vision and mold it into a workable plan. Finally, the entire process as well as the design work will be presented to the city in a prominent, public exhibition in September 2007.

Last week, members of the advisory group embarked on a field trip to New York to view firsthand a few of its recent waterfront development projects and to meet with key leaders who have helped guide it. Our task was not to copy New York’s development model or to find specific, pre-packaged solutions, but rather to learn about the many challenges New York has faced, the kinds of questions New Yorkers have asked and the steps they have taken in their planning processes. I believe that we gained significant insight into our own condition in Philadelphia. We have much to learn from New York’s (and other cities’) successes and failures when it comes to waterfront planning and development.

Our tour of New York began on the west side of Manhattan along a narrow strip next to the Hudson River. A generous bike path connecting a series of small-scale public spaces travels the length of the river and is punctuated by several multi-functional parks that have been created on the existing piers. At least 20 years in the making, this stretch of New York’s waterfront demonstrated the intensity and difficulty of any comprehensive planning process but also the potential rewards of fighting for a collective planning vision.

After a look at the high-end development of Battery Park City with its massive residential and commercial buildings, its focus on green building, and integrated public spaces and public art, we ended the day at the City of New York Planning Commission for presentations by 2 lead planners and remarks by Amanda Burden, executive director. We learned about plans currently underway for the East River waterfront and for a major redevelopment scheme on the waterfront in the Greenpoint-Williamsburg sections of Brooklyn. Certain parallels with Philadelphia can be seen in these projects: the largely post-industrial land in Brooklyn adjacent to thriving residential neighborhoods, and the East River waterfront’s struggle with the FDR elevated highway (like our own I-95).

I came away from the New York trip with two pressing concerns:

1) How do we guarantee access to affordable, humane housing when planning for residential development on the riverfront? We saw two different approaches to this question in New York: in Battery Park City no consideration was giving to affordable housing ($6500/month rents for a one bedroom!)—market forces are left unchecked, pushing the cost of housing to levels unmanageable by all but the very wealthy; in Greenpoint-Williamsburg we saw that the city has rezoned the waterfront area and created an incentive program which uses private development capital to fund a percentage of affordable housing. The former is untenable, the latter a first step but not without problems. My neighbors in Fishtown and Port Richmond—most of whom have lived there for generations—are in danger of being displaced by the wave of gentrification that is creeping north of center city in the form of rising housing costs and property taxes.

2) How do we create truly public, democratic space on the riverfront, knowing that we will need to most likely partner with private developers? Quasi-public spaces like shopping malls present the illusion of a public commons but our rights as citizens are incredibly limited in such spaces. If the city enters into development cooperations with the private sector, we must be careful to ensure that our open spaces on the riverfront are truly public, truly accessible to all citizens, and afford our guaranteed rights as citizens.

Moving forward, it is incredibly important that we participate as fully as we can in crafting and expressing our vision for the riverfront. We will need to consider difficult problems and respond with meaningful, complex solutions. How do we guarantee access to affordable, humane housing when planning for residential development on the riverfront? How do we create truly public, democratic space on the riverfront, knowing that we will most likely need to with private developers? How do we plan for a variety of uses on the riverfront which allow for green space and economic growth, new jobs and new recreational uses, new construction and historic preservation?

For too long the voices of everyday Philadelphians have been ignored while a few have made decisions about our city that do not serve the public good. Here is our chance, by order of Mayor Street, to declare what we desire for our city and to hold those who represent us accountable for realizing our vision. In the coming weeks there will be several public meetings around the city where we can express this vision and work with each other to develop a collective plan for the riverfront. Also, all meetings of the Central Delaware Advisory Group are open to the public. For more information about these events and all other news of the process, visit www.planphilly.com.

Update 12/1/06: Also see The People’s Waterfront at Green City Journal.

« Thoughts on the City of Angles (sic) / The Poetics of Decontextualization »